Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Page: 12
TOPIC: Langdon the liar
zorro Posted: 1 Week ago
Langdon the liar
#302661
Things went badly pear-shaped for Karl Langdon on last night’s 6PR sports programme. He’d done a pretty good job all week inserting bears between the audience and the stark reality of last weekend’s results (example – Tuesday night: “So I want to ask our listeners who they think has been the greatest centre-half forward they can remember?). Anything to take the focus away from Freo’s mighty start to the season and bright prospects for the future, and anything, ANYTHING, to divert attention away from the present and future train wreck that is the ooftits.

Trouble was, as in all all scandals, diversionary tactics just build pressure, and the dam wall burst last night when the Eagle’s announced the selection of 2006 premiership passenger Ashley Hansen for their loss against North Melbourne on Saturday. Well, the phones lit up like Colin Barnett’s nose with calls for Worsfold’s head, Sumich’s head, any bloody head; hurt and mystified followers moaning about their forward line, their back line, their past, their future... and suddenly Karl was under the pump.

Seriously under the pump, as it turned out, because he got no back-up from Hardie (who’ll, let’s face it, stick the knife into anything that’s down but still breathing) and – horror of horrors – the Slapper, who’s obviously not been attending briefing sessions in the West Coast Media Department bunker recently. Anyway, the further it went, the angrier and surlier Karl got, the more defensive and insistent he became that, somehow, what he perceives as the Eagles’ mighty past will somehow determine their future: “Can’t we talk about something else” he muttered as yet another caller questioned the Lynch/Hansen fiasco, “I’m bored with this”.

And then he said the oddest thing. Leaning into the microphone, a bit like Rush Limbaugh doing his sincerity shtick, Langdon explained why the Eagles would beat the Kangas this week. “Did you know” (I thought he was going to say “dear listener”), “that since John Todd was sacked by the Eagles in 1989, they have never lost three games in a row. Never”. It was like a universe (not this one, I suspect) stopped. I swear I could hear Hardie and Jakovich take in breath. A pin dropped noisily in the next room.

So here’s a list of the times the Eagles have dropped three or more games in a row since 2000. Sorry for taking up all this space.

1996: rounds 2 – 5 (4)
1997/8: rounds 21/22/1 (3)
1998: rounds 4 – 7 (4)
1998: round 21 – QF (3)
1999: rounds 15 – 17
1999: rounds 19 – 22 (4)
2000: rounds 12 – 17 (6)
2000/1: rounds 19 – 22, 1 – 2 (6)
2001: rounds 5 – 12 (8)
2001: rounds 14 – 17 (4)
2001: rounds 20 – 22 (3)
2002: rounds 18 – 21 (4)
2004: rounds 4 – 6 (3)
2008: rounds 2 – 8 (7)
2008: rounds 10 – 16 (7)
2008/9: rounds 20 – 22, 1 (4)
2009: rounds 8 – 12 (5)
2009: rounds 14 – 17 (4)

What’s going on in this turkey’s pinbrain? Does he think all we can remember are the big old years. Doesn’t he know that results get printed and stored for future reference? Hasn’t he heard of the internet?

He’s a sad, glib, stupid hack with a self-appointed agenda and fewer and fewer people with the lack of self-respect to be in his little posse. And he’s living proof that you can be a fool or a liar, but it pays not to be both.
Login to post a message.


moptop Posted: 1 Week ago
Re: Langdon the liar
#302663
Fantastic work, zorro. Makes good reading too. I think you should email it to the useless turd, plus Hardie and Slappo for good measure.
Login to post a message.


Rapidfire Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302664
Nice post Zorro....makes me smile.
Anyone seen the latest Eagirl propaganda advertisement? Now it is all about them doing good in the community....cos they are doing stuff all on the field!
Login to post a message.


Wizfan Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302666
Top work, z man. Great read.
Login to post a message.


mattis117 Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302669
While im not standing up for Carl, He was probably referring to the first three games of a season. But still making up a useless fact to give eagurls fans hope... dispicable
Login to post a message.


guy smiley Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302672
Nice work Zorro. I seem to be in a constant state of mirth.
Login to post a message.


expat Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302675
Great work z-man.

Geez than Langdon is a clown. ..... screw living in the past ... which all toasters appear to be

Move over Langdon, your days are numbered
Login to post a message.


Nodgey Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302677
Bloke here at work (who I suspect has no more inside knowledge than any of us) reckons that Lynch has been dropped because he's been talking to the GC17 people.

Anyone else hear this?

It can't be true can it? Guy McKenna's not that stupid is he?
Login to post a message.


The_Yeti Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302679
Was that talking or begging?

'Get me the &^*% outa here, theres too many bears!' sounds more like begging to me!
Login to post a message.


Rapidfire Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302681
Maybe GC17 are being sponsored by the ACTIV foundation and that is why they want one of their own like Lynch in the team!
Login to post a message.


DockerDanno Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302685
Sorry for taking up all this space.

Zorro, you can take up as much space as you like...

I'm starting to see posts on Perthnow and The West, stuff like "Why should we not be going for each other, we're all West Australian"...

Unbelievable!!
Login to post a message.


DockerDanno Posted: 1 Week ago
Re:Langdon the liar
#302686
Sorry for taking up all this space.

Zorro, you can take up as much space as you like...

I'm starting to see posts on Perthnow and The West, stuff like "Why should we not be going for each other, we're all West Australian"...

Unbelievable!!
Login to post a message.


Page: 12