Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Page: 123456789
TOPIC: Board Nominees
Muzza13 Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334785
I am responding to postings #333993 (Moorih); and #334704 (Badwolf) inviting participation in the discussion regarding Member Elected Directors.

As one of those nominees, obviously I am looking for as much support as I can get.

I have accepted nomination for the position because I am keen to make an effective and valuable contribution to the future of the Club.

I am an inaugural member of the Club and as a continuous member I have enjoyed the development of its rivalry with other AFL participants and the development of its current strong financial and membership position.

I have always been impressed by Fremantle’s desire to be a family-friendly club and with further strengthening of membership, if elected I would work hard to ensure this vision is not lost.

My role would be to look at proposals from the perspective of all stakeholders including members, sponsors, players and supporters.

My primary focus would be to make sure appropriate structures are in place to ensure sustained on-field success.

All decisions should take account of whether they will enhance the prospect of sustained on-field success.

See below for my answers to some of the questions raised in this forum:

Q. What would you have done in Kate’s situation?

A. I would have questioned the level of consultation more than it appears to have been questioned at the time. I would have expressed a personal preference for the white on purple and purple on white as the two match day strips.

Q. Why do you want to be on the Board and what’s in it for us if we vote for you?

A. I want to use my experience to help a Club that I am passionate about. I am confident enough to represent the views of members and supporters and know that shareholder interests are often aligned with the interests of other stakeholders.

Q. What can you do to restore our real strip?

A. I can assure that the changes that have been implemented are monitored for sometime after implementation and recommend reintroduction of the anchor if membership and/or on-field performance is suffering as a result.

Q. If you were voted in and the Board wanted to steam-roll a change where the Fremantle was dropped, how would you handle this?

A. This is dear to my heart being a long-time South Fremantle supporter and my wife being a long-time East Fremantle supporter. I would vigorously oppose such a change and point out to other Board members that Manchester (United) and Collingwood have been extremely successful and expansive without having taken their original base out of their name.

Q. What can you do for us, the members?

A. I am one of you and have a family of members to remind me of this. Members are the Club’s greatest asset and therefore, generally, what are in members best interests are also in shareholders best interest. I will press for improved consultation and push for structures that ensure sustained on-field success even if they come at a short-term cost. For example, I would ensure research into reducing the impact of travel on player performance is a priority. We shouldn’t have to be 10% superior to compete equitably with Melbourne based Clubs for a premiership.

Q. Will you help remove the Steve’s?

A. This can’t be ruled out, but it is likely that Board support to remove the CEO and/or the Chairman will depend on their performance against agreed Key Performance Indicators. The two most significant KPI’s being membership numbers and on-field performance. Even if the outcomes are not due to them the reality is that if Fremantle doesn’t perform in these two critical areas then the pressure goes on them and if they do then the pressure comes off.

Q. If you were on the Board how can you prevent this from happening again?

A. I believe that there would have been lessons learnt from the recent change management exercise and reminders to improve on the process, where similar circumstances arise, should be readily received. My role would be to provide those reminders and ensure that more robust research and consultations is included in the process and to only support change from “accepted” positions if clear advancement will result.

Murray Browne
[email protected]


Freo forever
Heave Ho!
Login to post a message.


purple33 Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334802
"Q. What can you do to restore our real strip?

A. I can assure that the changes that have been implemented are monitored for sometime after implementation and recommend reintroduction of the anchor if membership and/or on-field performance is suffering as a result."

Sigh.
Login to post a message.


Drubbing Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334803
I doubt people are going to un-renew memberships in droves, or the players suddenly turn into crabs because of a jumper change.

Besides, KPIs are elastic. Ric Hart presided over peaks and troughs, and after 2006, the weight of expectation (and KPIs no doubt) were about further peaks. Freo ramped up for a tilt at a flag and stacked the team with Essendon cast offs to have a crack.

It didn't happen, but Ric's position was never threatened.

KPIs are more corporate crap for 'this is what we're judged on, but we reserve the right to plead mitigating circumstances and general bad luck if we don't.'
Login to post a message.


Mushroom Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334807
Murray,
I received an email today from somebody from somebody from somebody else and originally from you.

If I may quote from it "I have always been impressed by Fremantle’s desire to be a family-friendly club and with further strengthening of membership, if elected I would work hard to ensure this vision is not lost"

The vision is already lost, but I would like to hear a lot more about vision. Members subscribe to a vision and members are family. Sustained success is important but should never discount the importance of values and principles used along the way of getting there. Some in the past have called it 'the journey'. Steve-esque dividing and conquering doesn’t cut it.


May I also inform you that the corporate box visit offered to the company I work for by the company you work for was for a West Coast game. This kind of thing must cease!
Login to post a message.


Muzza13 Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334823
Contact me via my email address above and I will make sure that your next invite to the corporate box is more appropriate to your needs.

Heave Ho
Login to post a message.


Mercury Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334825
Corporate box? Do you already rub shoulders with the Board, Muzza?
Login to post a message.


BadWolf Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334827
Does the corp box hold 40,000 purple rustys?
Login to post a message.


Muzza13 Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334828
The corporate box is used my our sales people to host customers from country WA. Unfortunately it has limited capacity, but is used 22 weeks of the year. Yes, in respect to an earlier post, I do have a close involvement with country WA and am able to represent their views, along with others, if elected.

Heave Ho
Login to post a message.


Charity22296 Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334841
I think that you answering the questions was very classy and responsible of you.
Login to post a message.


werdnarewop Posted: 1 Month, 2 Weeks ago
Re:Board Nominees
#334849
For a single shareholder to remove a MED because that person was communicating with their constituents isn't as easy as it sounds. Indeed it's difficult for the Government (as a single shareholder) to remove directors or boards despite being legally able to do so. It comes down to accountability and transparency. Whilst it maybe technically possible it would create all of the negative publicity and/or controversy that the FFC would be desperate to avoid. So the power may exist but it is definitely a two edged sword. Better yet a lobby group set up to challenge the Board, it's decisions and representation of the FFC as well as lobbying the Govt over the WAFC owning both clubs and not implementing the recommendations of the Crawford Report, despite referring to it repeatedly, would be a good idea.
Login to post a message.


Muzza13 Posted: 3 Weeks, 5 Days ago
Re:Board Nominees
#336555
Just a friendly reminder that voting for FFC Member Elected Director closes next Monday 22 November and I still need all the help I can get.

If you are eligible to vote, haven’t yet voted, and can find the few minutes required to help my cause, then:

Go to www.fremantlefc.com.au/
Click on Member Election Vote Here and it will take you to a news release
Click on Here to Vote which will take you to www.investorshare.com
Enter your Membership Number and Postcode to Login
Tick Murray Browne and press Continue (at the bottom of page 2) to view your vote
Press Submit (at the bottom of page 3) to register your vote

If you require further information refer to Posting # 334785.
Login to post a message.


Marked Posted: 3 Weeks, 5 Days ago
Re:Board Nominees
#336562
dream on muzza
Login to post a message.


Page: 123456789