Posted: 6 Days, 11 Hours ago
Q and A
|
#300899 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6 Days, 10 Hours ago
Re: Q and A
|
#300906 |
|
Both good players but always believe Hill to be the better fit for the team and the ground, and much more exciting for the fans.
Maybe Fev will take a photo of Rich in the shower and send it to some netball team and Rich will demand to come home. We could do with some more depth sitting on the pine.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6 Days, 2 Hours ago
The Hill Debate
|
#300938 |
|
The old picking Hill over Stumpy-arms debate is dead. Stumpy is a good midfielder, but after watching Hill last night can anyone really guess what this guys ceiling is?
How freaking good did he look last night? The guy just looks like a freak - he is just built to play elite sports - and his runs through the middle were sublime. And to think that we get to watch this guy for the next 10 years! Wow.
Too bad the one-eyed media love Notacluey so much - they should be asking the clueless idiots up the road why they picked this clown over the two of them instead. Was at the Lions game on Saturday night and he couldn't have been a bigger non-factor.
Can't wait to get back to WA and see the boys live again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 21 Hours ago
Re:The Hill Debate
|
#300976 |
|
Hill looked frickin awesome yesterday. It's a good thing Hill isn'tgetting the media attention Notacluey is - he doesn't need the pressure of media celebrity status.
Rich is still a great player though, even if he was quiet in round 1 - played some good finals action last season
and I reckon we have the depth to get into finals action if we can stay injury free - last year having long periods with no Crowley/Hayden/Palmer/Headland/Ballantyne etc etc made a huge difference to the side.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 21 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#300980 |
|
Hill did some awe inspiring things. The kid just doesn't make mistakes. Love watching him go about his business.
Hill > Rich > a rock > Notaclueey
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 21 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#300981 |
|
I recall Tim Gossage saying on radio that if the Dockers were to overlook Daniel Rich for Hill that it would be offical; that the club would have no idea and would spend the next ten years explaining away the decision. You remember that don't you Goss?
Now that the jury is in, what is the verdict on Tim Gossage?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 21 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#300982 |
|
D@#*&head....again! And he still believes Natiwhatever will win the brownlow and the slime will win the premiership
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 21 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#300983 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 17 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#301007 |
|
No one asked Wet Toast why they picked Masten ahead of Palmer? Same thing
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 17 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#301008 |
|
What about Barlow?
How did Freo get him?
Wasn't he training with Essendon? Didn't they have a rookie draft pick before freo?
Lots of questions but what are the answers, maybe the goose knows.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 17 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#301011 |
|
Wasn't Ballaz taken after Swift?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5 Days, 17 Hours ago
Re:Q and A
|
#301013 |
|
Swift wasn't taken. He was imposed.
|
|
|
|
|
