Posted: 3 Days, 7 Hours ago
Rich at 21
|
#302015 |
|
Now that the Hill v Rich question has been decisively settled, there's an intriguing conundrum.
If Rich was still available at pick 21, would you have taken him?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 7 Hours ago
Re: Rich at 21
|
#302016 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 7 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302019 |
|
Nope ,The Subanator anyday..
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 6 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302035 |
|
Not wanting to be too negative but one shot I saw of him on TV during the game he looked like a young J. Worsfold. I don't know if that is good or bad.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 6 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302038 |
|
roddirat, I think we took Ballantyne at 21, Suban was at 24 part of the trade for Warnock. The answer to the question doesn't change though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 6 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302039 |
|
Make no mistake Rich is a very very good player,but am more than satisfied that we selected Hill ahead of him.
But his game the other night against Carlton was good after a slow start.Look and see,in the replay,who layed the hard shepherd on the carlton player,for Fev to kick his first goal.
And by the way who are you asking if they would take Rich at 21.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 6 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302040 |
|
Great question Zorro. No, I honestly don't think I would.
You can't waddle around on Subi oval, don't care how long you can kick it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 5 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302051 |
|
Pass, next question please.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 5 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302056 |
|
Well, the NEXT question is Rich v Suban and so on until we get to Rich v Broughton...
Tough one, that!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 3 Hours ago
Re:Rich at 21
|
#302071 |
|
|
|
|
|
