Posted: 4 Days, 4 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298422 |
|
No Motlop , Brogan , Rodan or Carr.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 4 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298424 |
|
Stats: Standin Ruckman- Westoff= Almost every stat as 4 time AA Ruckman and Favored Rising Star Brownlow Medalist combined.
WeeGurls should have kept Seaby.
Stats don't lie. Plenty of excuses. Real Eagles don't like hot weather, maybe that's the reason.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 4 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298425 |
|
They missed Staker as well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 2 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298431 |
|
For a laugh i went thru the other mobs fan website...Geez how sentiment changes quick over that way!! Dalziell is copping an absolute roasting. Oh and apparently NicNat killed Port in the ruck, its just that he was so far ahead of everybody that they couldnt get to the ball...HAHAHA
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 2 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298432 |
|
Just out of curiosity were Port playing in different weather than the budgies? I keep hearing how hot it was for the wet toast players ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 2 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298435 |
|
No, Port were clearly 2 years ahead of the Wet Toast, and global warming made 27/2/12 a cosy 23 degrees
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 2 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298439 |
|
don't you worry about global warming, Nic Nat has a plan to fix it just as soon as he gets done with the middle-east conflict. Give him a week...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4 Days, 1 Hour ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298447 |
|
Too true,I went and had a look as well and sure enough there were slime fans rueing the loss of Staker..However the chardonnay set have installed Shueyyy as the emerging gun midfielder of the competition.How did I guess?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 20 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298530 |
|
just saw an interview with one of the eagles.
"we're not worried about winning, thats always woosha's attitude around this time of year"
this time of year being, of course, around when the eagles lose for the first time.
apparently nic nat was dominating the ruck, but mysteriously the eagles were getting few clearances. what a ddominant ruckman, definitely good thing they spent a ridiculous amount of money on him despite the fact he's played three AFL games.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3 Days, 20 Hours ago
Re:Power Smashing
|
#298534 |
|
I was out shopping for a new TV and also saw that news item. I'm always amused at the cheap spin the ooftits ... well, spin.
|
|
|
|
|
