Forgive me if this has been posted already I ran a quick check and couldn't see anything.
Pavlich actually stood for something last night on Ch 9 when talking about the Eagles shaming of those players at the nightclub. He said they had "hung them out to dry", he also went on to say that should have been the rhetoric in 2006 and alluded to them winning back then, so it's different.
Got me thinking as I didn't know whether Pavlich who had actually bothered to say something notable was in fact correct. Adam Simpson is a decent fellow and if he was coaching in 2006 I truly believe things would have been different. I think Simpson was justified to have a crack at them.
Nisbett. Let me ask you this, if the only circumstance that was different was they were winning games would get have spoken the way he did? He didn't have the right to speak.