Herkes tarafından bilinerek sevilen site olan 1xbet canlı adresi sizlere büyük avantajlar ile farklı bahis imkanları sunmaktadır. Bilindik bir firma olması nedeni ile her defasında yeni bir 1xbet güncel adrese taşınıyor. Paylaşılan adreslerden sizlere en uygun 1xbet türkiye giriş güncel adresine kolaylıkla hemen ulaşabilirsiniz. Sizlerde kolaylıkla her cihazınızda aktif olan 1xbet mobile ile bahis yaparak, üyelik oluşumunu halledebilirsiniz. Büyük promosyonlardan yararlanarak üyelik açmak için 1xbet live adresini kullana bilirsiniz. Üyelik oluşturduktan sonra kolaylıkla yatırım yapmak için mobil ödeme bahis kabul gördüğünü anlayabilirsiniz. Hiç bir yerde olmayan canlı bahis özelliklerini sizlerde hemen kullanın. Aktif bir şekilde işlem yapan canlı bahis sitesi editörler tarafından özenle araştırılarak seçilmiştir. Ülkemizde resmi yayın yapmayan sitelerin çoğu kaçak bahis adı altında görev yapmaktadır. İnternetten yayın yapan kaçak bahis siteleri kullanıcılarına yüksek oranlar sunan bir adrestir. Hemen sizlerde casino oyunun farkına ve eğlencesine varmak için kayıt oluşturun.
Forum
Index
Docker Discussions
List size conundrum

TOPIC: List size conundrum

cletus List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #15

cletus
Think this will go done as one of our better days....but without putting a dampner on things....is it a bit of a concern we could trafe much except picks?? We couldnt trade off anything we did not want....

Says a fair bit about our previous list...and current one.

Thats why we have a list conundrum....
Login to reply,

Gumnut List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #16

Gumnut
Waiting for the last minute Mega deal, Gold Coast offload pick 2 for Tom Sheridan and Cam Sutcliffe. Lightning strikes twice!!
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

purple kit List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #17

purple kit
We do have some issues now. So far it looks like this:
Out: MJ, Danyellen, Spur, Neale
In: Conca, Lobb, Hogan, Colyer.

We have to make at least 3 draft selections, so that means 3 to be delisted, we also traded in pick 65 so I think we’ll probably use it, which makes 4 to go, we definitely have too many tall players now but they are all contracted for another year.
Login to reply,

Freo o sonearo List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #18

Freo o sonearo
65 will be a rookie upgrade, Banfield, Nyhuis or Duman - all worthy.
Login to reply,

timmeh List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #19

timmeh
Picks can still be traded right up to draft night, so depending on how many players we intend to draft, any of the other clubs that need a few extra points might allow us to move up a bit later in the draft. Also depends on how many points will be needed for carter and where he fits in the draft

If your name is sheridan, sutcliffe and grey you would be pretty nervous.

I hope we can keep grey somehow
Login to reply,

Jason List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #20

Jason
Good thing going forward then that the two blokes who oversaw our list (mis-) management through the past decade have gone and one is off to (hopefully, mis-) manage Carltanks football dept.

All of Nyhuis, Dumas and Banfield have been offered contracts and will be elevated to the main list.

That means we’ll need to use our last 3 picks on them (i.e. 43, 65 & 81) - leaving us with only 14 & 31 as live picks.

So we’ll need to off-load at least 3 to even do just this.

That leaves no room for more rookies so I guess Giro & Strnadica will be retained there - or cut loose.

Pick 43 & 65 are a complete waste on rookie upgrades so I expect there’ll be some pick trading on draft night to improve our hand next year. Swapping these out for late rookie-upgrade picks to get us back into the 3rd &/or 4th rounds next year would be a great outcome.

But the numbers suggest it’s time up for Sheridan, Sutcliffe & Grey - especially now we’ve picked up Colyer.
Login to reply,

SaltyDog List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #21

SaltyDog
With the new 6-6-6 rule, I reckon talls will be making a big comeback. Freo ahead of the game maybe?
Login to reply,

exceed List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #22

exceed
I would keep grey just for cultural reasons and I think Sheridan being played away from the backline this year was ok.
Sutcliffe came in at pick 71 and while I don’t remember too many standout games managed under ross to play over a 100.
I think he has done remarkably well considering he came in as winger/forward before being put in defence where he was simply out of his depth and badly exposed.
Login to reply,
rogerrocks said You Beaut

slammen List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #23

slammen
It's time for Sandi to retire
Login to reply,
Suker said You Beaut

Freoheaven List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #24

Freoheaven
Slammen I think you’re correct, it’s time for Sandi to retire.

I think there will be news within the fortnight.
Login to reply,

Jason List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #25

Jason
They’ve just changed the rules in favour of tall ruckman and you want 211 to retire??

Madness, pure madness
Login to reply,

snoop List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #26

snoop
Surely we keep picking until our list is full. If we want 2-3 Rookie upgrades they can come at 80+ if we like. So we've got 14, 31, 43, 65, 81 as "live" picks if we want.
Login to reply,

Thornton List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #27

Thornton
Yeah Jason I dont think you've got your rookie upgrading methodology correct, teams dont have to use "live" picks on rookies they just upgrade after they've picked all the player they want. Can go into rounds 6, 7 and 8 but once clubs start passing the late rounds are only a couple picks in length.
Login to reply,

rogerrocks List size conundrum 5 years 6 months ago #28

rogerrocks
Won't Apeness go?
Login to reply,
Forum
Index
Docker Discussions
List size conundrum