Yes ....well done to him and I'd rather him him than not have him.
Was interesting to watch the last match where Rich and Hill were both on the park with 10years of AFL footy behind them. Think it is obvious the selection of Hill was well and truly justified.
But - (and I am ready to cop some abuse for this )- has he really got to the place we all thought he could.?
Yep, no mug plays 200 games and wins a few gongs along the way....but, I've always felt a bit disappointed that he has rarely "ripped games apart" by imposing himself on the game. (Ie compare to Fyfe where he has 'willed himself' into the games outcome)
Hilly is always there or therabouts doing 'some good things' and having a few freakish moments, but I'd reckon 8 years ago, I thought I'd see him being a much more dominant player than he has been.
Is he tagged out of the game too easily?
Is he tagged too much because hes so dangerous?
Has he not been allowed to be the player he can be??(especially in recent times)
Think the answer to the above questions is " yes ", just wish it was also the answer to the question :
"Does Hilly break games open and dominate them?"
Anyhow...hope he "rips this game in Darwin apart"..!! and is allowed to celebrate his milestone...
