Herkes tarafından bilinerek sevilen site olan 1xbet canlı adresi sizlere büyük avantajlar ile farklı bahis imkanları sunmaktadır. Bilindik bir firma olması nedeni ile her defasında yeni bir 1xbet güncel adrese taşınıyor. Paylaşılan adreslerden sizlere en uygun 1xbet türkiye giriş güncel adresine kolaylıkla hemen ulaşabilirsiniz. Sizlerde kolaylıkla her cihazınızda aktif olan 1xbet mobile ile bahis yaparak, üyelik oluşumunu halledebilirsiniz. Büyük promosyonlardan yararlanarak üyelik açmak için 1xbet live adresini kullana bilirsiniz. Üyelik oluşturduktan sonra kolaylıkla yatırım yapmak için mobil ödeme bahis kabul gördüğünü anlayabilirsiniz. Hiç bir yerde olmayan canlı bahis özelliklerini sizlerde hemen kullanın. Aktif bir şekilde işlem yapan canlı bahis sitesi editörler tarafından özenle araştırılarak seçilmiştir. Ülkemizde resmi yayın yapmayan sitelerin çoğu kaçak bahis adı altında görev yapmaktadır. İnternetten yayın yapan kaçak bahis siteleri kullanıcılarına yüksek oranlar sunan bir adrestir. Hemen sizlerde casino oyunun farkına ve eğlencesine varmak için kayıt oluşturun.

TOPIC: Agree Or Disagree?

Morgan Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #15

Morgan
I’m not sure there’s a problem. Some games are thrilling, and some are turgid. It’s always been that way.

Along with Shane, I’d get rid of runners, and I’d also limit interchanges to after goals only. There’s a safety element there too, because one day a young player is going to be blindsided and seriously hurt by a thug like NicNat sneaking off the interchange bench and trying to hurt someone.

I’d keep coaches in the box, only because if you made them sit at ground level they’d just find a sneaky way around it.

The interesting one for mine is whether you end up reducing the number of players on the ground to 16 (which they’ve tried with the AFLW). Players are covering more ground than ever before, but grounds have stayed the same size. It’s not the only reason for congestion, but it’s a contributor. But that one could go with way – it could create more space for players to execute skills, or it could mean coaches just find even fitter players and still have no-one in their forward lines.

I’d be inclined to tweak at the edges for now.
Login to reply,
DougGreen said You Beaut

Vucuum Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #16

Vucuum
A friend made a suggestion that sounded reasonable to me. Go back to the old days of no interchange, with substitutes only. Was 2 on the bench way back when but maybe make it up to 8 to choose from for any injuries you have and then it's something for the coaches to risk. They can chance their hand as early as they like but if you're a man down without a sub, you're a man down. Play would open up with players not being able to all run flat out all of the time. Maybe it'll even go back to the old positional style footy.

The only other things is call players for incorrect disposal. Get tackled and don't dispose of it by hand or foot and you're pinged. None of this attempted rubbish. Free kick makes players run away from the ball to cover space, rather than endless ballups dragging everyone to the ball.

Maybe look at the third man, but I like Sandy only having to deal with one spud at a time.
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

shane Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #17

shane
The flawed assumption with reducing interchanges and limiting players is that coaches will play their most talented footballers and let them get tired. History would suggest they will keep doing things the same way and find or make fitter players.
Login to reply,

Vucuum Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #18

Vucuum
How fit could players get without something other than running and weights?
Login to reply,
goodie said You Beaut

Noddy Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #19

Noddy
If we go back to the old rules, can I put in an order for an EH 179 Holden with custom paint, always wanted a 179 but dad only had the 149.
Login to reply,
ploud, Suker said You Beaut

expat Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #20

expat
I'd like there to be no rule changes each year. Maybe only introduce any new changes once every 4 years once it has been tested and scrutinized at another level.

If the umpires can't keep up with the play such that they are making errors in judgement, then maybe they need to be fitter.

Or how about synchronized whistles so that only 1 whistle can blow and only the controlling umpire's whistle can blow. That will stop an umpire 80m off play getting involved.
Login to reply,

Noddy Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #21

Noddy
Can we start by retiring the three stooges of umpiring?
Login to reply,
point less, okeedokee, Raglan Matt said You Beaut

hypen Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #22

hypen
What about awarding bonus premiership points for superior % ? You could make sure every team had played each other by round 17 so as to ensure equity. It's a system that rewards attacking football.
Login to reply,

Docker by the Sea Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #23

Docker by the Sea
I find it difficult to give credit to claims about why reducing the interchanges won’t help without even trying. I can’t see why there is such a resistance to it. It doesn’t alter the structure or how the game is played and it is a reversal of rule changes that have been added not a new rule.
My logic says a more traditional style of line up would become viable ie resting ruck forward, rover in forward pocket etc.
Login to reply,
goodie said You Beaut

DS Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #24

DS
"Along with Shane, I’d get rid of runners, "

Morgan, that can be interpreted that you'd like to get rid of Shane and runners.

Please clarify.
Login to reply,
DocDocker, shane, Raglan Matt said You Beaut

shane Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #25

shane
I don't think it would reward attacking football.

12.8 (80) to 6.4(40) is 200%
and
17.8 (110) to 10.10 (70) is 158%

So you're not going to change the mindset of a coach who thinks defending a low total is the best way to win the game.
Login to reply,

FD1016 Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #26

FD1016
If players stayed in their rightful positions my DuFFLe team would make much more sense but I digress...
I first arrived (1995) before they got rid of the biff and full forwards and full backs were just that. The fit looking guys were those who played on the wings and the tough guys were KPP’s. Now it seems it’s survival of the fittest. Injuries happen much more often, mostly soft tissue injuries associated with elite athletes. Don’t know what the answer is but today’s game seems to reply much more on finely tuned skills and speed.
Login to reply,
Bizkit said You Beaut

Morgan Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #27

Morgan
DS, I don't want to get rid of Shane, but if he chose to leave of his own accord then fundamental to the Dockerland respect and responsibility policy is privacy for all parties, and clearly I need to respect that, and I’m not in a position to comment.
Login to reply,
DS, DocDocker, rogerrocks, DougGreen, expat, Rhufus said You Beaut

Corporal Agarn Agree Or Disagree? 5 years 11 months ago #28

Corporal Agarn
What were you wearing at the time of the incident sir and were any lewd comments passed?
Login to reply,
Suker said You Beaut