Snoop, that was my first reaction too, and it's still worth trying. But I think the idea of Fyfe forward, Mundy back is better in theory than practise.
I was a disappointed in the way Mundy played down back this year. It seems like it would be a natural fit - he's got good size, great skills, and spent time there as a (maligned) young guy. He could wind down his career as a better version of Duffield. Except he was lousy this season in that role, and I don't really have an explanation for why.
Fyfe forward also presents it's own difficulties. He's an elite mark matched up against midfielders. Would he be an elite mark against blokes bigger than him? He's not quick enough to beat anyone on a lead. His best go is drifting forward and exposing match-ups, rather than being stationed forward. Roly intimated earlier this year that Fyfe was reluctant to go forward, which was interesting to me.
It feels like surely you can rotate different players through different parts of the ground, but I just don't think it's as easy as all that. I mean, if you read this article, you'd have sworn Roly felt the same way we do.
www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/ross-lyon-jok...20160204-gmlvm4.html