I dont dislike Roly, in fact I supported the selection of Roly purely because I thought he was a better coach than Harvs. I still do. Sure I felt sorry for Harvs but I also felt sorry for myself having been a Docker supporter since inception and having suffered over the years, so I thought stuff it, get him in, Im glad.
The problem though, is Roly might be better than Harvs but hes not as good as Clarkson.
All these discussions about whether its the cattle, the injuries or the coaching. Ask yourself one question: If Clarkson had come to Freo say in 2010 and Roly had gone to Hawks in 2010, how many flags would each club have won??
When you are trying to win a flag, all critique has to be measured up against the yard stick. Im not interested if hes better than Simpson or Pyke, i compare him to Clarkson and at this stage, Bizkit is right, hes needs to improve.
The problem is, ive seen no evidence in three years or so of any significant changes to the way he goes about it.