Agree Morgan, ... regarding, "the only think that is missing from our forward line is a bloke who can clunk a mark, and a bit more efficient delivery.", ... I had a quick look at the stats (coz Morgan loves stats) to try to get an idea of the clunked marks inside the forward 50 for the WeePoos, the Slime and Freo.
What I found was tall forwards, taking contested marks in the forward lines for the teams are;
WeePoos - Gunston, McEvoy & Roughead (& Rioli small forward)
the Slime - Kennedy, Sinclair, Darling (occasionally Yeo)
Freo - Sandilands, Pavlich, Tabernar (& Walters small forward, occasionally Fyfe)
Out of those, Hawthorn has the smallest contribution of Tall Contested Marks in the forward line (the Slime the most, Freo in between).
This suggests to me a few things, firstly, big tall contested marks in the forward line is not essential to high scoring and high scoring efficiency. Secondly, "more efficient delivery" appears to be extremely important and is what Fremantle currently lacks (backed up by our much lower i50's 1056, compared to WeePoos 1210 and Slime 1152). And thirdly, two of our three tall forwards (211 & Pav), will likely both be retired in the coming years and the other (Tabernar) is widely criticised by fellow Dockerlanders.