Herkes tarafından bilinerek sevilen site olan 1xbet canlı adresi sizlere büyük avantajlar ile farklı bahis imkanları sunmaktadır. Bilindik bir firma olması nedeni ile her defasında yeni bir 1xbet güncel adrese taşınıyor. Paylaşılan adreslerden sizlere en uygun 1xbet türkiye giriş güncel adresine kolaylıkla hemen ulaşabilirsiniz. Sizlerde kolaylıkla her cihazınızda aktif olan 1xbet mobile ile bahis yaparak, üyelik oluşumunu halledebilirsiniz. Büyük promosyonlardan yararlanarak üyelik açmak için 1xbet live adresini kullana bilirsiniz. Üyelik oluşturduktan sonra kolaylıkla yatırım yapmak için mobil ödeme bahis kabul gördüğünü anlayabilirsiniz. Hiç bir yerde olmayan canlı bahis özelliklerini sizlerde hemen kullanın. Aktif bir şekilde işlem yapan canlı bahis sitesi editörler tarafından özenle araştırılarak seçilmiştir. Ülkemizde resmi yayın yapmayan sitelerin çoğu kaçak bahis adı altında görev yapmaktadır. İnternetten yayın yapan kaçak bahis siteleri kullanıcılarına yüksek oranlar sunan bir adrestir. Hemen sizlerde casino oyunun farkına ve eğlencesine varmak için kayıt oluşturun.

TOPIC: These Bumps

hypen These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #1

hypen
And all the commotion about the one week difference between Pickett and McAdam.

I can't contribute as I don't know the exact text of the rule or how the MRP applies its matrix of severity and intent.

However what I'd like to add is what is getting lost in technical discussion is the absence of this elemental question, "do we or don't we want the bump in the game"?I feel like we are trying to have the cake and eat it too.

You can't herald the bump as fundamental to the game and then be outraged on incidents that are occurring in a fraction of a second. Keep the bump this will keep happening.

Just get rid of the bloody thing.
Login to reply,
Mercury, The American said You Beaut

Noddy These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #2

Noddy
Given the current class action against the AFL, taking out the bump is the only easy way to demonstrate they’re taking any action to lessen the number of head injuries to players.
Login to reply,

shane These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #3

shane
I'm a bit disappointed this was about the tribunal and not

Login to reply,
jezzaargh, shirtfront said You Beaut

shane These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #4

shane
Having researched the topic, I can't believe they did not once use the word bumps in that song.
Login to reply,

hypen These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #5

hypen
They too are genius.
Login to reply,
shane said You Beaut

jezzaargh These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #6

jezzaargh
Noddy, my prediction is the AFL will show their concern for player welfare by reaching a confidential settlement that ensures key medical evidence on the question of causes and consequences of concussion remains out of the public domain and is not a topic of any judicial pronouncements
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

Mushroom These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #7

Mushroom
And yet the clubs, complicit in the instruction, training and welfare of the players, and ultimately the consequences of when bumps go wrong, continue to challenge the outcomes of the match review panel and tribunal processes.

""This is clearly not a high bump because it doesn't in any way involve the head."
Well, good on ya Mr Duggan QC (why still QC by the way? He has plenty of spare time to make up fairy tales because he doesn't counsel anyone anymore), and nice work Adelaide www.afl.com.au/news/886962/crows-to-appe...bump-debate-rolls-on.

This is a mess, created by the AFL. They need to take a line, a reasonable line, and be strong enough to hold to it.
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

Freo66 These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #8

Freo66
They now have to rule out the outcome or potential outcome. Purely has to be based on intent. If you decide to bump or hip and shoulder, it's going to be lengthy for a hit to the head.
Login to reply,

hypen These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #9

hypen
If in twenty five years the AFL is getting compensation claims similar to now, they will fry. The link between repeated concussion and CTE is known.

All this protocol stuff, it's mitigation. It comes after the event. Eliminate the risk.
Login to reply,
Mushroom said You Beaut

shane These Bumps 1 year 1 week ago #10

shane
I would put it to you that most bumps do not result in a concussion and that most concussion injuries are not caused by bumps.

The main factor in reducing these injuries is that the players respect the health of their opponents, and they play the ball. I think most of the players are pretty good at this, but the off-field people probably have a long way to go in accepting this.
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

hypen These Bumps 1 year 6 days ago #11

hypen
www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com...h-picketts-high-bump

No they are catalyst to really bad things happening.
Login to reply,
Mushroom said You Beaut

Raglan Matt These Bumps 1 year 6 days ago #12

Raglan Matt
Shane, the problem starts with the lack of consistency in punishing the high hits. It is a rod the AwFL has made for it's own back by pandering to the commercial interests in this day and age.
Login to reply,

Mushroom These Bumps 1 year 6 days ago #13

Mushroom
Absolutely, it can't be simply about statistics of consequence when you can't yet diagnose CTE until a post-mortem.

This is about managing risk and I don't think anyone can objectively look at the ability to shirt-front someone with a shoulder and, be it high contact or not, say that if it happens then the risk of head injury is low.

There will be people who will never play this game if it continues to be within the rules to attempt to take another player out this way.

There will be people who do play this game who will never play it again because of being taken out this way.

There will be people who are permanently damaged, or worse.

Some of them could be future Fyfes, or Pavlichs, or Mundys. And it is preventable without eliminating footy as a game.
Login to reply,

Straddo These Bumps 1 year 6 days ago #14

Straddo
I think the problem we (the AFL) have at the moment is that for years they've built up a culture of punishing players for immediately obvious negative outcomes and the suspension criteria seems to reflect that culture. If players can get up, you know you're likely to either get off or get a light penalty, we're seeing that in Adelaide's case and immediate appeal.

What was obvious in McAdams case is that there was no need for that hit, he could just as easily have tackled him instead. Picketts was similar, except that he was late to the contest, so a tackle in that circumstance would have resulted in a free kick, if the bump wasn't high play would have likely continued.

I love the bump, but i don't love it enough to ask 600+ people every year to expose themselves to a high probability that some of them will have to sacrifice years of their lives for me to enjoy one aspect of the game.

AFL needs to find a way to change the rules to disincentivise the bump, maybe that means that late tackles/contact isn't penalised in some circumstances, probably means higher penalties for both head and potential head high contact regardless of outcome. Penalise the putting of another person at danger rather than the negative outcome.
Login to reply,
blockerhall, ManInPurple said You Beaut