TOPIC: MRO

shane MRO 1 month 8 hours ago #15

shane
Dibs you have to tell him.
Login to reply,
The_Yeti said You Beaut

The_Yeti MRO 1 month 8 hours ago #16

The_Yeti
Yeah, you tell him....and don't think hiding behind a wall will protect you.
Egurls Suck!
Login to reply,
shane said You Beaut

jockstrap MRO 1 month 7 hours ago #17

jockstrap
How come Mitchell didn't get fined for his obvious acting as though he had got a high tackle and laughing about it after his free kick.
Login to reply,
heycharger, Raglan Matt, Sunny, Burton said You Beaut

zorro MRO 1 month 7 hours ago #18

zorro
Or lose one premiership point. That’d learn ‘em.
Login to reply,

Sunny MRO 4 weeks 1 day ago #19

Sunny
Grown men picking on boys just because they can’t play as well as they can and need to hurt them to try to win a game of sport.
Embarrassing Hawthorn - should be ashamed of yourselves.
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt, quinninup said You Beaut

Walter the baker MRO 4 weeks 1 day ago #20

Walter the baker
$2000 penalties for blokes in $300k+ p.a. !!
Less than 1% of the average annual salary ... not much of a penalty or disincentive.

Maybe set penalties based on 5% increments of salary in the future. That would help to avoid a stupid theoretical situation like Buddy getting a $1k hit while collecting $1,000k p.a.
Login to reply,
Sunny said You Beaut

Raglan Matt MRO 4 weeks 1 day ago #21

Raglan Matt
No, give them 3 weeks suspension, with no match payments, and the fine. Make it a disincentive to offend, not an incentive.
Login to reply,
Sunny said You Beaut

Bizkit MRO 4 weeks 21 hours ago #22

Bizkit
I don't think players are worried about their wallet when out on the ground and in the thick of the action.
Nathan: When did you get balls?
Simon: I've always had balls you've just never seen them.
Nathan: That's the gayest thing I've ever heard.
Login to reply,
DS, shane, CaptSnooze said You Beaut

Raglan Matt MRO 4 weeks 21 hours ago #23

Raglan Matt
No, but they are worried about suspensions, and the cumulative effects of continuing to offend.
Login to reply,

CaptSnooze MRO 4 weeks 19 hours ago #24

CaptSnooze
They'll be more worried about not carrying out instructions, than copping a small fine
Login to reply,

CaptSnooze MRO 4 weeks 19 hours ago #25

CaptSnooze
The effect of this, you'd hope, is to discourage teams from employing thuggery as a tactic against Fremantle. Carlton got away with injuring players, which set the template for Hawthorn to run with. We'll see what teams do from now on.
Login to reply,

Raglan Matt MRO 4 weeks 14 hours ago #26

Raglan Matt
Actually, Cap'n, we will see what the Umps & MRP do from here on.
Login to reply,
heycharger, CaptSnooze said You Beaut

purple kit MRO 4 weeks 10 hours ago #27

purple kit
The umps started the game impartially, just calling the frees as they saw them, by qtr time we had 11 to the hawks 1, somebody obviously got in their ear at qtr time because the hawks didn’t stop infringing the freo players but the free kicks stopped being paid. This seemed to embolden the hawks players who got worse, as the game started to get out of hand with spot fires all over the ground, the umps responded by paying frees against freo players for standing up for themselves, like the one against Brayshaw. The whole thing was a mess. If it wasn’t for the freo coaches telling our players to ignore their tactics and get on with playing the game, it could have turned very ugly with an all in brawl.
Sometimes the umps need to ignore the count and just keep paying the obvious frees as they see them.
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt, Sunny said You Beaut

Morgan MRO 4 weeks 10 hours ago #28

Morgan
Do you think there could ever be a circumstance where Freo was on the wrong end of an 11-1 free kick count and you’d go: ‘yeah, these umps are calling them like they see them’?
Login to reply,
rogerrocks, Docker by the Sea said You Beaut