I had a work-mate jumping around about how Nicnat was number 1.
I grabbed his 2019 stats and compared them to Sandi's which is 5 games vs Sandi's 6. I included a column of CBP (Children's Books Published) but he didn't notice.
Even allowing for the 20% difference in games to Sandi, his stats were in several areas above Nicnats and comparable in the rest. So I compiled that (with Sandi as Player X) and sent it to said work mate, including a list of Brownlow winners from the last ten years and the top three of the budgies club champions award over the same time frame.
Needless to say the facts didn't support his number 1 assertion. Doesn't even support an assertion of him being a top three e-girl.
His response? "Well obviously Player X is Fyfe and of course he has better stats than Nicnat ..."
I would have thought the hit out numbers etc would have made it clear that it was a ruckman vs ruckman comparison ....
But they are a dumb bunch. Dumb as boxes of hammers.