I profess I do not understand this rule.
I would love someone to explain it to me.?
I do understand there is an 'exclusion zone' , but, Colyer was following his man ans made no deviation towards the 'kicker' (Mcintosh), nor, the 'man on the mark' (Ryan. )
50m penalty for ' doing nothing of intent' seems way too harsh to.me.
If Colyer had 'run into' the zone, or refused to leave it, i'd understand.
His only option was to run away from the man he was running with and allow him to run past for the handball.
Bad rule , or bad interpretatuon of a stupid rule.!