If ‘experts’ (I'm looking at you Wayne Carey) used 5% of time they spent complaining about not understanding the tribunal / umpiring rules, actually investigating the rules, watching televised footy would be a more pleasant experience.
Schultz’ tackle is different to Gibbs’ because it wasn’t too actions.
Still, he is facing the prospect of careless conduct, high impact, which would give him two weeks. Did he ‘drive’ his opponent into the ground when his arms are pinned, or was it momentum? It’s a tough call.