I wasn't trying to make a sweeping statement Redned. I don't know which is the best poll for these sorts of things, but the
ABC's Vote Compass at the last election had 'climate change' as the most important issue for around 29% of voters. That percentage is much higher for ALP and Greens voters, of which there are proportionally many in the Freo electorate.
So I think it's probably true that a significant proportion of Freo supporters would have some reservations about Woodside as a sponsor compared with, say, Mazda or QBE, or another of our sponsors like BankWest.
In your view, what percentage of fans would have to be put offside before it's a bad business decision to line up with a particular sponsor?