Kane Cornes said something on the the Sunday Footy Show, that Freo would have to trade Darcy if we get Luke Jackson. Huh? Why? I would have thought Darcy is a required player. I will say, however, that Darcy's form over the past few weeks has been average since all of the Jackson-to-Freo talk has ramped up.
The bottom line is pretty clear isn't it? Lobb wants out (he wanted out last year) and Freo can move to get Jackson and play him in Lobb's role, or am I missing something? The only scenario that I can see that Jackson replaces Darcy is if Lobb stays, and that's not likely.
