I hope he’s as good as some on here are saying, and I hope Logue turns out as average as some on here have said.
I’m not convinced.
At a time when I believe, we should be creating a culture, similar to Geelong, and Richmond. We are offering huge money to an unproven talent. How do we encourage others to take a little less for the ultimate success?
Sure I watched his GF, his 3rd quarter was great. I’ve also watched at least another 10 games where I haven’t noticed him. That was despite me paying particular attention due to our interest.
We have probably the second best ruckman in the game at 24.
Now I hear we are going to use Jackson like Blicsav’s. Where is the evidence he can play this role?
Some on here have scoffed at the prospect of Logue playing through the centre. In my opinion Jackson becoming a midfielder is equally as unlikely. I can’t see any reason why Logue couldn’t be given a crack at Acres role.
I watched McCarthy before we recruited him, he also showed moments of brilliance. That turned out well.
Then again, I was dubious about recruiting Clark. He’s been way better than I thought. Although we missed Motlop because of that trade. Could Logue of played more down back, or Wilson have done similar in a much more competitive team.
I’m extremely worried we are going to hijack ourselves again. That we’ve over estimated Logue’s love of the team, and low balled him.
My feel atm is we should’ve kept backing this group in, and trusting the draft.
