TOPIC: Nat Fyfe

Corporal Agarn Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #29

Corporal Agarn
Hasn't set fire to any houses yet though has he?
Login to reply,

zorro Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #30

zorro
If a team of 18 Nat Fyfes played A team of 18 of any other player ever, he would take them apart.

That, in any case, is why a bloke I know well who’s in the AFL Hall of Fame says Nat is the best player ever. It’s a bit of left-field logic, but it’s hard to argue with.
Login to reply,
shane said You Beaut

cookie Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #31

cookie
18 Pavs might give him a run for his money
Login to reply,
Sox said You Beaut

shane Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #32

shane
One of the Pavs would have to lay a tackle.
Login to reply,
Blue1red1, cookie, Morgan, rogerrocks, pollyanna, Freo o sonearo, Raglan Matt said You Beaut

Raglan Matt Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #33

Raglan Matt
Zorro, a team of Pollys or a team of Stephen Michaels would give him a fair old nudge. ( and a couple of pretty decent shirtfronts, in TI's case.)
Login to reply,

zorro Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #34

zorro
Oh, Rags, they’d slaughter them. The Fyfes would take about ten contested marks each, have a dozen clearances each, even more contested performances each and neither the Pollies or TIes would score.
Login to reply,

Corporal Agarn Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #35

Corporal Agarn
Yeah, I don't know about Polly. Fitness is a concern for me. Too many durries and beers
.

What's that? Not the same Polly? Right you are, carry on.
Login to reply,
cletus, pollyanna, Raglan Matt said You Beaut

Morgan Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #36

Morgan
I reckon I'd take a team of Pavs, but only just.

Mostly because I reckon a fair percentage of the Pavs would stay in their position and play their role (including in defence), and there's a small chance that all the Fyfes bang into each other trying to win the game themselves.
Login to reply,

pollyanna Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #37

pollyanna
I would take a team of Buddy Franklins, but that's beside the point.

Nat Fyfe walks up to you and says "I'm Nat Fyfe and I'm currently the best player in the AwFL', he ain't smiling, he tosses the ball to you then stands the mark.

Me? I would toss the ball back to free up my hands and reach for a smoke to help remember a good joke.
Login to reply,
The_Yeti said You Beaut

Sox Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #38

Sox
A team of son-sons would beat a team of Fyfes. Burn them for pace. But I don’t see Walters winning a brownlow. Fyfe might. Was McPharlin a better defender than Bell was a midfielder? Hard to compare across lines, I reckon.

That said.... I’d give my left dangler to see a team of Fyfes play a team of Pav’s.
Login to reply,

Walter the baker Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #39

Walter the baker
a team of Fyfes playing a team of Pavs
... it wouldn’t be a fair fight. The team of Pav’s would have an AA fullback, CHB, midfielder and CHF (and, from memory, interchange). Fyfe ... just a midfielder...
Login to reply,
Raglan Matt said You Beaut

TheColonel Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #40

TheColonel
What do you call a mob of Fyfes? - A Truck
What do you call a mob of Pavs? - A Nostril
What do you call a mob of TIs/ - Brilliant.
Login to reply,

Stacksonthemill Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #41

Stacksonthemill
I'm interested to know who would want the Sox dangler.
Login to reply,
Blue1red1, Corporal Agarn said You Beaut

Corporal Agarn Nat Fyfe 2 months 1 week ago #42

Corporal Agarn
Unwanted dangler response.

Login to reply,
Blue1red1, pollyanna, Stacksonthemill said You Beaut