I can understand a PhD student making a few mistakes in a second language, but there's an academic overseeing this project, and you'd think they'd check the content of the survey. Apparently not.
Repetitive, pointless, meandering questions. Has the aim of these even been thought through? It's like a Hypen post in survey form.
Not surprising really, because such a survey is pointless. The FFC websites a corporate communications and marketing tool, not a chat forum. I'd no sooner go to FFC for a chat, than I would go to Coles to get a prostate check.
I'd fail this PhD at concept stage, but then I toe-cut at will.