I go to the footy to see my team compete against another team, in order to determine who is better at football. Essendon’s actions undermined that competition, and, if it’s proven they were given performance enhancing drugs, I hope the book is thrown at them. By ‘book’, I mean in a football sense. Because, you know, it’s football.
What the players do outside of this engagement interests me very little. They should be held to account as private citizens the same way as I am. If a court of law finds Harley Bennell guilty of possessing / using drugs, then I don’t think his sentence should be affected one way or the other by the fact he is a footballer. I think most would agree.
Where it gets grey is how much control a club / the AFL should have over the human beings that are employed to play football for them, and how quick they should be to take that livelihood away from them. Players need a private life, and in this private life some of them are going to take drugs. Around 10% of people 14 and over have tried cocaine. That’s equates to about 72 current AFL players. But can you imagine what that percentage is for the young men with the connections and financial resources of AFL footy players?
How much more scrutiny and testing should be put on the players? Surely they are close to the threshold of reasonableness already. Should the clubs / AFL have surveillance? Should they have private investigators? Should clubs be required to act on every rumour that is going around? Is that a just way to treat a person?
And how does naming, shaming, and ending the careers of players help them? How does it help society?