The decision that puzzled me most in last weekend's game (and there were many) occurred when Micheal Johnson was taking a kick on the fiddy and Soloman (I think) provided a shepherd to allow him to run around the man on the mark. To me it looked like a legit piece of 'play on' resulting in a goal, however, it was called back and had to be retaken. Surely if we offended in some way we should have lost the ball otherwise the goal should have stood. From memory it was at a crucial time and goals at the Subi end were hard to get. Can someone Please Explain?