Dockerland.com
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottom Top of Board Post Reply
TOPIC:
 lemon Posted: 2008/09/04 16:01 #268231
adrian anderson must be sacked
or maybe not.

can someone explain the criteria on how they pick the winner?

all i can find is this:

"One young player is nominated for the award after each round of home-and-away matches, with a panel of experts choosing the winner at the end of the season. To qualify for the NAB AFL Rising Star nomination, a player must be under 21 years of age as at January 1 of that year, must not have played more than 10 games to the start of that season and must not have been suspended by the AFL or State League tribunals during the season".

plenty on eligibility but not much on criteria.

so did rhys win because he had the best year (a'la brownlow) or because he is the best player (a'la aflpa mvp)?

i only ask because if it is the former (and i want proof not hearsay) then adrian anderson must go as it's obvious he was on the punt or has no idea or both.

if it was mvp style he has a leg to stand on.
 
The administrator has disabled public write access.
      Topics Author Date
    thread link
adrian anderson must be sacked
lemon 2008/09/04 16:01
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
rogerbelly 2008/09/04 16:03
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
Dolphin 2008/09/04 16:10
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
guy smiley 2008/09/04 16:12
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
lemon 2008/09/04 16:18
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
addicted 2008/09/04 16:35
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
Dolphin 2008/09/04 16:37
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
pants 2008/09/04 16:38
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
lemon 2008/09/04 16:46
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
guy smiley 2008/09/04 16:50
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
Walter the baker 2008/09/04 16:54
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
lemon 2008/09/04 17:05
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
shane 2008/09/04 17:15
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
FreoBear 2008/09/04 17:11
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
gloved one 2008/09/04 21:24
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
Ellement 2008/09/05 08:51
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
rocky333 2008/09/05 08:57
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
lemon 2008/09/05 09:02
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
Dropkick 2008/09/05 09:38
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
11SJW 2008/09/05 11:00
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
blockerhall 2008/09/05 11:21
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re:adrian anderson must be sacked
The Big D 2008/09/05 11:31
Go to top Top of Board Post Reply
Powered by FireBoard